I'm sitting on the patio of a restaurant while my grandfather waxes on about the world--how it was, how it is, how it will be. He starts talking about Bush and how Bush's administration is the embodiment of fascism and--I kid you not--
exactly at that second a CNN headline pops up on the TV behind him: "Bush Declares War on Fascism." It was eerie, and it was also incredibly infuriating. How can the president of the United States fail to know what fascism actually means? How can he use it as a throwaway pejorative when his own government comes dangerously close to mirroring the dictionary definition of fascism? How can we allow this?
Now "fascism" is just another conservative buzzword, like "liberal" or "9/11." It will soon be stripped of any actual meaning, making it impossible for Bush's critics to effectively use it against him. It will get thrown around and applied to everyone from Saddam Hussein to Cindy Sheehan. It's an egregious offense against semantics and I'm hoping it will push some moderately conservative Americans over the edge. I'm not certain, though, because I'm afraid too many people don't know what fascism really means and are too scared of sounding "unpatriotic" or too swept up in the cult of Bush to bother finding out. Bush keeps commandeering these concepts by linking them with whatever he opposes: now that fascism and Iraq are all bound up, anyone who opposes the war in Iraq is, naturally, a supporter of fascism.
Calling the war on terrorism a war on fascism just doesn't make any
sense, especially applied to the current situation in Iraq. We're not fighting a strong, nationalistic government there; we're not fighting any opposing government. If there's a fascist government to be fought, it's the one
we put in place. Even the Iraqi government under Saddam was not fascist: it was authoritarian, meaning it advocated total state control without the backing of the sort of justifying ideology to which we in America have fallen prey. Saddam wanted total power, let everyone know he wanted total power, and simply wiped out anyone who opposed his possession of that power. Not admirable, but certainly not fascist. Fascism requires a nationalistic force, embodied by a supreme, dictatorial leader who uses anti-liberalist, militaristic rhetoric as the grounds for his unethical actions. Sound familiar?
Decide for yourself. That should be your right. Blindly branding a person or government as fascist may make sense in Bush's mind, but not in mine. For your consideration, though, here are three definitions of fascism that bear unsettling similarities to the ideological path our supposedly immortal, unimpeachable nation now follows:
1. "Fascism may be defined as a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation, or victim-hood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy, and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion."--Robert O. Paxton, Columbia University Professor and author of
The Anatomy of Fascism2. "Fascism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition."--Merriam Webster Online Dictionary
3. "Granted that the 19th century was the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the 20th century must also be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain. We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the 'right', a Fascist century. If the 19th century was the century of the individual (liberalism implies individualism) we are free to believe that this is the 'collective' century, and therefore the century of the State."--Benito Mussolini, in
The Political and Social Doctrine of FascismWhether Bush is fascist or not, there's no question that what he is doing is wrong. Call it what you will, give it a foundation in nationalism or religion, but the fact still remains: war is mass murder. Mass murder? Pretty certain that's wrong. Mass murder with twisted ideological justifications, wrapped in the American flag and a self-righteous sense of being victimized by all Muslims (since really, the ones who crash into buildings with planes and the ones getting bombed by us in their living rooms are pretty much the same)? Perhaps even more wrong. Damn rhetoric, damn name-calling, damn slanted debate. Wrong is wrong, Mr. President. That's one word and one fact you
can't change.
Bush of George: Bush of Ghosts Remix--MentalhealthGeorge Bush Doesn't Care About Black People--KOBush War Blues--Billy Bragg